Indien flutet den Nachwuchswettbewerb mit Materialspieler(innen)

[Carline]

Zitat von Noppenzar

Fact two is that the plastic balls have made it more difficult for the material players to score directly with the material side, .

You are confused about this.
The "material player" is the player who uses adouble inverted racket using "materials" that are both (ITTF unapproved as well illegal under comon law) to boost their inverted rubbers.

Please stop using "Material player" in the context of players using pimples.
Pijmples players are NOT "material players". Pimples players are "'tactical' 'athletes'".

The boosted material players have been using the phrase "material player" to brainwash the tactical athletes into believing that tactical athletes have no skill & they win ONE & ONLY because of their pimples & therefoe they are not really athletes at the same level as robotic double inverted loopers (hackers).

Pimples players must imemdiately stop falling for this brainwashing & believing that they are the slaves to the double inverted masters.

This nonsense of calling tactical athletes as "material players" must stop immeditely.
This is degrading, belittling and extremely offensive.

[Kyuss]

mimimi

[Carline]

Zitat von Noppenzar

A truly world-class player will never lose to Luka Mladenovic twice in a row

Yeah but the truly world class player is classified as such on a severely tilted playing field in favor of the boosted loopers, with 11 rule & regulation changes to severely limit pips / anti.
That is not valid on a level & fair playing field that is also better for spectators at pro levels.
The rules are designed by the ITTF who is a slave of the robotic loopers. The robot loopers want quick end to points with third & fifth ball attacks. Such 3rd & 5th ball attacks are the worst from spectator point of view but robot loopers (so called "normal" players, which is also a degrading phrase) get very angry when the pips / anti players won't let the robotic loopers run their 3rd ball scam with boosted rackets.

But as I pointed out earlier your so called "normal player" model using boosted double inverted is a total scam used by the ITTF to brainwash the playing public & treat tactical athletes as second, third & fourth class citizens. I explained all this in my detailed post yesterday.

To reemphasize again, a tactical athlete using a combination racket is the ONLY NORMAL PLAYER in table tennis, based on human anatomy (of naturally inherent weaker or different style backhand) & neuro-science implications for children & elderly

[Lexmark]

Wenn die indischen Damen an den Tisch gehen beende ich den Livestream, einfach gruselig anzuschauen und unsportlich

[Carline]

Zitat von Lexmark

Wenn die indischen Damen an den Tisch gehen beende ich den Livestream, einfach gruselig anzuschauen und unsportlich

Oh yeah any player who uses a combination racket is an inconvenient nuisance to the robotic looper & is unsportsmanlike.

Even if the double inverted racket is unnatural ebcause it is against the principles of human anatomy (of weaker backhand) & also against neuro science principles for young chidlren & older adults.

And last but not the least did I forget to mention how the 3rd ball & 5th ball attacks with boosted double inverted rackest have brought billions of spectators to the sport.

OK

[Noppenzar]

Zitat von Carline

You are confused about this.
The "material player" is the player who uses adouble inverted racket using "materials" that are both (ITTF unapproved as well illegal under comon law) to boost their inverted rubbers.

Please stop using "Material player" in the context of players using pimples.
Pijmples players are NOT "material players". Pimples players are "'tactical' 'athletes'".

The boosted material players have been using the phrase "material player" to brainwash the tactical athletes into believing that tactical athletes have no skill & they win ONE & ONLY because of their pimples & therefoe they are not really athletes at the same level as robotic double inverted loopers (hackers).

Pimples players must imemdiately stop falling for this brainwashing & believing that they are the slaves to the double inverted masters.

This nonsense of calling tactical athletes as "material players" must stop immeditely.
This is degrading, belittling and extremely offensive.

Je mehr Booster bzw. früher Kleber, desto besser ist es für Materialspieler (auf Deutsch nennt man die so, es ist eine Beschreibung, keine Wertung). Die meisten tischnahen Materialspieler boostern übrigens selber die VH.

Am schlimmsten für Materialspieler waren früher ungeboosterte Roxon oder Nimbus beim Gegner. Klopperbeläge, die kaum Spin generierten.

[Lennox Levenach]

Zitat von Matousek

@Noppenzar
gehe mit konform.

Ja, das hört sich plausibel an. Und auch ja, dass die besseren MaterialspielerInnen die NI Seite ggf. auch boostern

[Lennox Levenach]

WTT Feeder Cappadocia 2024

[Dominikk85]

Ich finde es ehrlich gesagt gut weil Indien ja nicht nur juniorentitel abräumen will, sondern auch viele ihrer top Spielerinnen so spielen.

Man muss den Stil ja nicht schön finden, aber die meisten sind sich einig dass mehr Variation an spielstilen gut für das spiel ist und Indien hat sich da mit Spielerinnen wie Batra eine Identität aufgebaut.

Natürlich hat so ein Spiel seine Limits und die chinesinnen wird man so nicht schlagen, aber seien wir mal ehrlich das werden die europäischen SH Angreiferinnen auch nicht schaffen.

Wenn jetzt die Hälfte der Spielerinnen materialspielerinnen wären fände ich das auch nicht schlecht, aber wenn 10-15% der top100 in der Welt "ungewöhnliche" stile hätten (Abwehr, penhold...) fände ich das schon gut für das Spiel.

[ratzinho]

Ich finde es auch klasse. Das eine eine wertvolle Facette von Tischtennis und sollte daher auch in der Weltspitze vertreten sein.

Und als Amateurspieler finde ich es sehr beruhigend, dass auch WeltklassespielerInnen so ihre Probleme mit Material haben